Recently, I completed the first draft of a slasher novella I’ve titled CUTTHROAT that I began in early September.
The premise is stupifyingly simple, though, like many of my works, it’s riddled with satiric malice and dark humor:
A group of job applicants arrive at a sleek highrise for a coveted position, but find themselves trapped and fighting for their lives against a psychopathic assessor known as Cutthroat, who wields a briefcase full of nasty weapons and is out to kill all of them.
This first draft clocked in at around 31,000 words, and it proved to be both exhausting and grossly liberating at the same time. This was one of those “cutting loose” sort of writing experiments, where I didn’t feel bound by the ordinary constraints of storytelling. Though there are two character arcs, a strong mid-point shift, a late reveal, and a twisty plot with some inventive kills. Thematically, it’s centered around the tortuous difficulties attendant with job hunting, with the whole ugly process personified in the form of a psychopathic killer known as Cutthroat, who poses as a job recruiter performing interviews, only to hack his unawares applicants apart. I really tried to go for the economic malaise zeitgeist’s jugular here that mainly desperate jobseeking Millennials and Gen-Zers are suffering through or at least might relate to. Armed with briefcases filled with all kinds of nasty weapons, Cutthroat sadisticallly plays his own twisted “assessment” games with the group of twenty-somethings, and it’s up to the protagonist to figure out a way to stop him, or at least escape with his life.
Writing a slasher is brutish work, to say the least. I’ve written my share of horrors, such as The Devil’s Throne, released a few years ago, but a slasher is another beast altogether. Slashers, obviously, are less known for their elegant exploration of human themes through a lens of supernatural or psychological chills like traditional horrors, and more about delivering a certain graphic and visceral effect on the reader/viewer.
Cutthroat is sort of “Terrifier in a business suit,” as I’ve come to refer to it as a means to sum up its ethos in a pithy “elevator pitch” manner. The slasher franchise set around Art the Clown is a real phenomenon for its cult following. Walk by any Hot Topic store in a mall and you’re bound to see Art T-shirts and other merch. He’s as big as Freddy Krueger or Jason Voorhees were in their day. I’ve only seen the second film and the first half of the first one. That’s literally all I could stomach. From a writer’s perspective, I found them shockingly bereft of any “story,” even for a slasher series. The Terrifier films are more a bunch of gory vignettes strung together. A bloody highlight reel of makeup and special effects. Even Friday the 13th, with all its clumsy and meandering “plots” had a semblance of mythology what with Jason and his mommy issues. Not so for Terrifier, which seems content to just freak out audiences with new methods of bodily mutilation. Hellraiser seems tame by comparison, which seems not possible.
Honestly, I found writing my first slasher disappointingly mundane. How many ways can you really butcher human beings on paper? I found myself straining to somehow “make it more interesting.” I did this by interjecting a backstory for the villain in order to make him believable, and by adding humor wherever possible. At one point I gave up for a few days, put off by the whole thing. Only to return days later determined to finish the task.
Now that it’s done, like often happens when I’ve finished a writing project, I find myself wracked with a post-partum malaise. Though there is always the long and tedious editing process.
I remember reading about how John Carpenter, while struggling to write Halloween II (1981) hit some bad writer’s block. I wondered how in the hell could that happen. We’re talking Michael Myers here. Pehaps the most simplistic masked killer there ever was. Just set him loose in a school so he can stalk another group of dumb horny teenagers. How hard could it be, right? But after writing my first slasher, I can see where he was likely coming from, and how unfulfilled he probably felt trying his hand at the sequel. It’s no wonder he wound up throwing in the bogus development about Laurie Strode being Michael’s sister as a way to liven things up and add motivation. Something he later regretted adding to Michael’s “mythology” due to its inherent silliness. The whole point of Michael Myers is that he doesn’t need a “motivation.” That’s what makes him scary. But I can see how sheer boredom probably drove Carpenter to want to throw in anything, no matter how nonsensical, to make the writing process more palatable for him. At least The Thing had the intricate puzzlebox mysteries of “Who’s the Thing and who’s not?” “Who can you trust?” With Halloween, it’s more just about coming up with new ways Michael can kill people.
On the surface, writing a slasher is “stupidly easy,” sure. Kind of. We’re not writing a dense Cormac McCarthian Western here, even if Anton Chigurh is like a Mexican Michael Myers with a shotgun. But it takes a piece of your soul. There are also the tricky mechanics of coming up with a bigger than life villain. Something iconic. A Nightmare on Elm Street, to me, is the gold standard when it comes to slashers. It’s probably the most intelligent of them. Certainly it’s the best high-concept horror idea. A killer that stalks you in your dreams. The kind of idea that makes you go, “Why didn’t I think of that?”
Overall, I enjoyed attempting the slasher genre, though it’s not one I’d quickly want to return to. Technically, it’s not actually my first stab at it. I handwrote a short story about a group of masked killers stalking a school way back when I was a teenager in high school. It was a story obviously ripped off of Halloween as I’d just seen that film on cable, though I added a “clever” twist by not having one, or two, but three killers. Genius, obviously. With this latest attempt decades later, I like to think I’ve grown and matured. I feel I made Cutthroat suitably gory and satisfied the demands of the genre with all the requisite tropes, while putting my own touch on things and bringing something new. If anything, it was a fun writing exercise that felt perfectly appropriate with Halloween right around the corner. 🙂
For some reason, this movie popped into my head recently, and I just had to rewatch it. I don’t know why. I seem to recall seeing it in theaters while on a beach vacation in Ocean City, Maryland back in the summer of 1998. Though the film actually stayed in theaters for over a year.
Films did that back then. Now they dip in and out in like two weeks before hitting streaming oblivion.
It’s weird watching something from the ’90s, as it is basically a period piece anymore. This film is nearly thirty-freaking years old! It is as ancient to modern audiences today as something from the mid-’60s would have been during its premier.
There’s Something About Mary is a screwball romantic comedy about a guy named Ted trying to reconnect with his old high school crush–the titual Mary. Mary Jensen, that is. Following a catalysmically awful prom date that goes sideways in the film’s second most memorable sequence when Ted gets his dick and balls stuck in his zipper after arriving at Mary’s house. Poor Ted spends the next 13 years still pining (borderline obsessing) over Mary, until he gins up a scheme to sick a private detective on her to hunt down her whereabouts. Finding her in South Florida, Ted takes off to reconnect with his old flame, encounting a series of mad-cap adventures along the way. But competing with him for Mary’s heart is the greasy private detective, an old college boyfriend, a slippery pizza delivery guy, and even a famous football QB star. Will Ted, the ultimate nice guy, win Mary’s heart in the end?
Of course, the film is BEST remembered for its “Is that hair gel?” scene when Ted and Mary are preparing to go on a date. Believe me, that line was the height of bawdy comedy in my high school during that year. Between that and the many Monica Lewinsky jokes flying around (and there were many), my junior year was beset with semen-based hilarity.
In fact, I’d say there has likely never been a time ever in human history when male ejaculation centered so prominently in the cultural psyche as it did in the year 1998.That’s all thanks to Monica and Mary.
There’s Something About Mary is beset with a hideous amount of ’90s anachronisms, both technologically and cultural. Things that just wouldn’t work in today’s self-aware uber ironic entertainment landscape. The ’90s was all about being okay with looking stupid. It was the decade of Dumb and Dumber, Jim Carrey, and wacky attitude-y cartoons like Animaniacs. Weird toys like Gak. Very stupid and cringey TV shows. And lots of bright neon colors.
People nostalgia-gazming hard on the decade often forget how damn silly the ’90s really was. And that’s probably the best way to describe Mary. Silly with a capital ‘S.’
The entire conceit of the film falls apart in the age of Facebook and Google. Now it’s not only easy to look someone up from high school, you likely can’t even get rid of them anyway if they follow you on Insta or Facebook.
Then there’s the whole stalking angle. What Ted does is technically kind of creepy. While he does sorta pay for it when he’s forced to confess at the film’s “All is Lost” beat, and is consequentially kicked to the curb, true love conquers all of course in the end.
There’s the idea of a bunch of men fixating on Mary as a sex object in a predatory way that would be seen as “problematic” now. The film gets away with it mostly due to its unflinching cartooniness. The Farrelly brothers were at their peak. The story has heart, though its punctured by a lot of slapstick nonsense.
There’s Something About Mary really is one of those films that wouldn’t be made today. It’s an odd time capsule of a film. A relic from a very niche era of cornball humor that couldn’t be replicated. A perfect representation of what the ’90s was all about.
It does have some classical elements, too. The recurring motif of the singers reminded me of the singing muses often seen in Shakespeare plays or Greek epics. The crude sexual humor harkens back to the stylings of the ancient Greek play Lysistrata. There are some borrowed elements also. The police interrogation misunderstanding feels lifted from 1992s My Cousin Vinny, for instance. But overall it’s a funny original story with a handful of memorable scenes beyond the hair gel one. The fish hook gag, as an example.
Ben Stiller stars in one of his early big roles. At the start of his early 2000s tsunami of comedy hits like Meet the Parents and Zoolander. Cameron Diaz plays the lovely and lanky Mary. And there is the adaptable Matt Dillon as the greasy private eye with the porn stache.
Need some ’90s flavor in your life? Who doesn’t, right? Check out There’s Something About Mary.
I’m not a Tarantino stan by any means, though like many, I admire his work and his unique voice. I was too young to see his early stuff like Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction. Only years later did I appreciate True Romance and Jackie Brown.
The two-time Oscar winner and pastiche-r of genres is kind of the patron saint artist for college students. Or cult leader, if you prefer. I would hear about him all the damn time and how great his movies are when I was in school. I think that’s why I put off watching them for so long. They were so constantly hyped up like “You gotta see it, bro!” that it had the opposite effect on me. I actually fell asleep the first time I was made to watch Pulp Fiction. I’m still kinda neutral about that one. I see the appeal, but it just never captured me, as most films featuring race as a prominent theme generally don’t. I have a younger cousin who loves it and calls it his favorite film.
Tarantino dominated the 1990s. His turn-of-the-millenium output has seen equal critical and commercial success, though maybe not in the same generational-zeitgeisty way as his early stuff. Even now, I passively follow his work, which for me remains hit or miss. I only recently saw Inglorious Basterds. Miss. Never saw Death Proof. Saw Django Unchained once. Eh, it was okay. Hated The Hateful Eight. Enjoyed Once Upon a Time…In Hollywood, though it felt underdeveloped and indulgent.
I do, however, fucking love Kill Bill Vol. I and II.
Credit: Miramax
Kill Bill holds a special place in my heart. Not just because I really like the story, but because of the memorable venue where I originally saw it. I was 21 and going to a private college in north Chicago in 2003. Loyola University sits wedged alongside Lake Shore Drive and Lake Michigan, and like many city schools, criss-crosses different neighborhoods of varying class levels. You’ve got your gentrified hipster streets, your more “ghetto” areas, your working class avenues, and your young professional couple cheapo condo building spots. Of course you have all the retail staples. Chinese food. Delis. Convenience stores. And bars. Lots of bars.
And you have the “ghettoplex.”
Chapter Two: The “Ghettoplex”
The “ghettoplex.” This was a tiny run-down old fashioned style theater on North Sheridan Road. Opened in 1913, it’s name was originally The Regent. In 1990 new ownership renamed it Village North Theater. Then it became the New 400 in 2009. Like many theaters, Covid punched it hard in the face. But it eventually reopened. Only to suddenly (and finally?) close in 2023.
I never knew the theater by any of its real names. It was just the ghettoplex around campus. The ghettoplex had only a few auditoriums. It attracted an eclective mix of people from all walks of life. Mainly broke college students. But also hipsters. Whites, Blacks, Hispanics. Uptight professionals. Homeless. Thugs. Everyone. Every screening was a melting pot and often chaotic, with people shouting at the screen, getting up and down, arguing, throwing food, amongst other activities. Even though I typically hate interruptions during movies, the ghettoplex was the one venue in which it seemed not just appropriate, but even welcome.
In other words, it was the perfect place to watch the vibrantly raucous Kill Bill: Vol I.
I was instantly attracted to Kill Bill from the trailer and all the advertising, as it looked unlike anything I’d ever seen. Which is ironic, considering it’s a blend of several classic film genres; namely spaghetti Westerns and ‘70’s Bruce Lee-style Martial arts flicks, combined with noirish crime and pulpy gangster revenge stories. Some people credit No Country for Old Men (2007) with starting the neo-Western trend that still continues today with The Last Stop In Yuma County (2023). But I think Vol. II of Kill Bill has an argument for being a bigger influence.
That Tarantino was splitting his new film into two parts felt audacious also. The Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions did that the same year. But they were both highly anticipated sequels to the beloved 1999 hit. It felt strange for even a respected artist like Tarantino to do the same with an original story that didn’t already have millions of built-in fans. Especially after a six-year hiatus from film making. His last film Jackie Brown (1997) didn’t exactly light the world on fire. There were even whisperings that Tarantino was just a ’90s man. That he wouldn’t make the jump to the new century with us coming-of-age Millennials.
I didn’t really care about Tarantino’s earlier works. I hadn’t even seen them at the time. All I knew was Kill Bill looked pretty badass. So, off to the ghettoplex I went the weekend of October 10, 2003.
Chapter Three: Ratatino, The Giant Rat
Movie theaters today are trying so hard to create immersive viewing experiences. There’s 3D, IMAX, 4DX, those D-Box seats that vibrate, stadium seating, and the latest and greatest in The Sphere in Las Vegas, NV, which has a near 360-degree wrap-around screen that’s so transportive it will give you anxiety. I highly recommend going. It’s mindblowing.
However, no theaters have considered the visceral experience that our good friends of the Rodentia order can freely provide during a film screening.
Kill Bill provoked hoots, hollers, “oh shits,” “fuck nawws,” and more from the get-go. The opening scene where The Bride surprises suburban homemaker Vernita Green (aka Copperhead) was a riot. “I should have been motherfucking Black Mamba,” brought laughs. The Kaboom cereal attack and its subsequent knife to the heart caused gasps. It was the kind of rare opening where you just knew you were in for a classic good time.
For me, the strongest reaction came at about the mid-point. It was right after when The Bride visits Hattori Hanzo to have a custom-made Samurai sword made and she’s off to Tokyo to deal with O-Ren when a giant rat ran across the bottom of the screen.
Now, for years I had often heard the legend of New York City’s giant sewer rats. As a new citizen of Chicago, it had not even occured to me that such massive cat-sized rodents could also live in the Midwest.
This rat was fucking huge. I’m not sure if it was in front of the screen or behind. It was a giant black shadow that scurried underneath Uma Thurman while she was determinedly seated on the airplane as The Green Hornet theme played. It ran across, its tail flopping behind it as thick as a coaxial cable, until reaching the other side and disappearing. The memory is burned into my brain. I’m not sure if anyone else even noticed it, as nobody reacted. I asked my friends that I’d gone with later about it, and they swear they never saw a rat. But given that the theater was called the “ghettoplex,” perhaps such gargantuan infestation was simply expected. Maybe this particular R.O.U.S. frequented the establishment and was well-known. I don’t know. But it freaked me out in kind of a good way.
What made it even better was that not long before, The Bride tells Hanzo about how she has a giant rat to kill (meaning Bill, of course). Did “Ratatino” (the name I gave him) hear Uma mention his species namesake, and take that as a cue to come out of hiding? Who knows. But I’m glad he did. God bless you Ratatino, wherever you are.
Chapter Four: Kill Bill and I
Have I mentioned how much I fucking love this movie? Good, I’ll jump into the many reasons why.
1. Uma
Credit: Miramax
Okay, ngl, Uma Thurman became my movie crush for years after Kill Bill, displacing Katie Holmes’ solid four-year run, and knocking out an insurgent Jessica Alba. But aside from my own star-struck amore, Thurman really was perfectly cast for the role of The Bride/Beatrix Kiddo. I only found this out recently, but it was actually she and Quentin who conceived of the idea for Kill Bill while on the set of Pulp Fiction. This is why the credits for the story are “Q&U.” Tarantino refers to Thurman as his “muse.” It’s easy to see why. Uma’s tall, near-Amazonian figure ignites the screen, hacking and slashing away like a blonde supermodel Grim Reaper. The movie thrives on juxtapostion and irony — West meets East, red blood on snow, spaghetti Western meets Kung-fu flick — a killer ex-bride (and mom) on a bloody rampage is striking. Her big blue eyes are as close to “anime eyes” as one can physically get without CGI enhancement. The whole effect is instantly iconic.
Very often, whenever talk of “badass action heroines” comes up, the go-to examples are always Ellen Ripley or Sarah Connor. Sadly, The Bride seems to be constantly left out, and deserves to be placed atop that stage. Uma’s performance is also enhanced mightily by the character’s maternal qualities, which mirrored her own. She’d already had two children by filming, and her daughter Maya Hawke was almost the same age as her movie-daughter B.B.
Uma also deftly handles the film’s more darkly comedic elements. Tarantino flicks are known for their outlandish violence, but it’s their nuance, complexity, and subtext that make them endearing and memorable. During The Bride’s interactions with O-Ren, her attitude shifts across a range of channels — vicious determination, inside humor, cruel taunts, sharp retorts, respect, and even tenderness. There’s a sense the two women were once best friends before the falling out. A hard subtlety to pull off, which Uma does in spades. Her whole performance is solid throughout.
2. Soundtrack
It may be cliché to describe a film as a “symphony,” but in the case of Kill Bill, it’s apt, and largely because of its pitch perfect soundtrack. As we first saw in Reservoir Dogs with the “Stuck in the Middle With You” scene, Tarantino likes to pick ironic music during violent scenes. But many of the musical cues are also just traditionally fitting. And “original.” Not in the sense that all the music was written specifically for the film. In the sense that much of the music was comprised of lesser known hits that Tarantino dusted off and reused in surprising and dove-tailing ways.
Some of my favorites are “The Flower of Carnage,” which plays directly after The Bride gives O-Ren the worst haircut ever. The song bears significance, as it’s sung by Meiko Kaji, an icon of Japanese cinema, who famously played Lady Snowblood (1973), an inspiration for Kill Bill. “Crane/White Lightning” by RZA is another one I enjoy. “The Demise of Barbara and the Return of Joe” perfectly encapsulates the end of the climactic battle between Beatrix and Bill. “Battle Without Honor or Humanity” was a major hit from the soundtrack.
3. The Mythology
One of the ways a great film pulls you into the embrace is with its often implied but sometimes depicted mythology. Star Wars is the best example of this, of course. Who the hell is this Darth Vader guy? Why has this Ben guy been hiding out in the desert? What’s a Clone War? While its prequels and sequels filled in the details with mixed results, what makes the original special is all the mysterious backstory.
Kill Bill does a similar thing. Giving us just enough backstory through flashbacks to keep the main story going, but also digging into the classified files, so to speak, of many of its characters. There’s a whole animated sequence that shows O-Ren Ishii’s tragic childhood that lead her to taking over the Yakuza gang in Tokyo. Even O-Ren’s bodyguard Gogo Yubari gets a mini biopic.
My favorite is the chapter “The Cruel Tutelage of Pai Mei,” which shows us quite explicitly how The Bride became trained to what is practically a supernatural-level of martial arts expertise. Then there’s the sequence with Hattori Hanzo. If there’s one criticism I have, it’s that I wished we could have seen a little of Hanzo actually making the sword. But perhaps it’s better that it remains a mystery how a seemingly simple bar owner in Okinawa is able to craft a weapon that can “cut God.”
4. The Venn Diagram “Super Movie”
To go along with Number 3, Kill Bill is also a good example of what differentiates a great story from a pretty average one. It combines a number of narratives that could on their own be a movie, into a “super” movie— like a Venn diagram — with the main one in the middle. You could do a whole film just on Bill founding the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad, Pai Mei, O-Ren, even Gogo Yubari.
To say nothing of the some of the “loose ends.” What in the hell happened to Sofie Fatale? Actually, I don’t want to know. Did Elle Driver make it out of the desert after losing her eye? My vote is the Black Mamba snake eventually got her. Will Vernita Green’s daughter Nikki grow up seeking revenge on The Bride? More on that in Chapter Five. Here’s where editorial and artistic restraint are needed. Sometimes it’s better to leave people wondering. It’s not always best to fill in all the details, as some of the excessive and creatively bankrupt Star Wars spin-offs have shown.
5. The Subversive Humor
Credit: Miramax
The Pussy Wagon. Kaboom cereal. Much of the Bride and Elle’s fight. Budd’s shitty station in life as a bouncer at the titty bar. Beatrix Kiddo’s name reveal in the kid’s classroom. Boss Tanaka provoking O-Ren’s sensitivity about her mixed Japanese and Chinese heritage (a scene I always appreciated as a mixed-race person myself). I could go on and on.
Striking the right balance in tone for a movie about a woman going around cutting people’s heads off is tough. But necessary. Like much of Tarantino’s work, Kill Bill is very self-aware and post-modern. The bloody graphic kills in the Showdown at the House of Blue Leaves are cartoonishly but purposely over the top.
6. The Cliffhanger
The end of Kill Bill Vol I., where Bill reveals to the butchered Sofie that The Bride’s daughter is still alive elicited a few gasps from the rowdy audience at the “ghettoplex,” as I recall. It’s one of the first real film cliffhangers I remember that left me really wanting to know what happened next. As I was never a fan of the Star Wars sequels, the ending of The Empire Strikes Back never rustled my jimmies. The end of Matrix Reloaded was tepid and actually kind of confusing. The only other film ending that left me really wanting more was, oddly enough, The Blob. A film with a sequel tease that’s still not been paid off some thirty years later.
Making it all the better was that Kill Bill Vol. II premiered on April 16th, my birthday, the following year (2004). What a perfect birthday present.
I’d be remiss not to mention the Herculean (or perhaps She-Hulkian) physical contributions made by the peerless and legendary stuntwoman Zoë Bell. Bell sustained serious injuries filming the scene where The Bride gets blown away by Budd’s shotgun blast. In addition to being a “crash and smash” double for Uma, Bell also doubled for her in the fight scenes, becoming trained on swordplay and combat moves herself. Stunt work is often underappreciated, but the work done in Kill Bill went above and beyond. Both Bell and Uma got put through the ringer for our entertainment.
There’s also this dark episode from the making of the movie that honestly hampers my enjoyment of the film. Tarantino pressured Thurman to perform a dangerous driving stunt that wound up leaving her hospitalized with neck and knee injuries that she still suffers from to this day. The accident led to a falling out between her and Tarantino for 15 years. Uma doesn’t blame him so much as she blames the film’s executive producer Harvey Weinstein — yeah, this fucker again — for trying to sweep the whole thing under the rug. Check out this link here detailing Thurman’s account of the ordeal, which also contains a frightening video of the car crash. It’s very sad and sickening for any actress to be forced into a stunt for which she is not trained or prepared. But to do it to the star of your movie who inspired the story itself, is grossly irresponsible and monstrous. This is on top of Thurman having had an encounter with the disgraced former Hollywood producer in which Weinstein allegedly assaulted her in hotel in the ’90s. You can read about that here.
Uma Thurman describes her experience after the crash as “dehumanization to the point of death.” It’s a stark and scary reminder that for all its glitz and glamour, Hollywood is at its core, a brutal business that has allowed some real abusive assholes to gain power. There is a human cost that sometimes takes place behind the camera that often goes unnoticed. The unseemly developments I’ve mentioned don’t ruin Kill Bill. They do, however, give me a recontextualized appreciation for all the literal blood, sweat, and tears that went into making it.
8. Poetic Fights And Fates
Perhaps Kill Bill’s most creative component are all the diverse and fitting ways in which members of the Deadly Viper Assassination Squad get their comeuppance for their role in Bill’s attack on The Bride. Vernita Green’s death is quick and brutal, hinting at the fact that likely the two women were never exactly close. As I mentioned earlier, O-Ren’s drawn-out “graceful” demise indicates that she and Beatrix were probably besties at one point.
As her former brother-in-law, it seemed The Bride was satisfied with giving Budd a quick and painless death by surprising him at his shitty trailer. But a Black Mamba still wound up getting him anyway due to the vicious one-eyed Elle Driver. Driver and Beatrix were clearly hated rivals of one another, both professionally, but also romantically over Bill. Elle tells Bill, “You need me baby, I’m there,” over the phone before her surprise confrontation with The Bride. Their duel is a messy cat fight, ending after Beatrix yoinks Elle’s eye. This after Elle sneeringly and proudly confesses to poisoning Pai Mei, who plucked out her eye for impudence during her training.
Then there’s Bill’s death, which is both cathartically satisfying, but also bittersweet and tragic. At its core, Kill Bill is about a serious marital spat, and all the fallout that ensues. Both sides can be blamed. I always got the sense that if Beatrix had explained her side to Bill about not wanting her daughter to grow up in the life rather than just running off, he’d have likely understood and made proper arrangements. A workable compromise probably would have been reached. But this is not a story about rational, level-headed people. This is a story about brutal killers who think impulsively. We’ll never know what could have been.
9. Even Side Characters Are Memorable
This kind of goes along with mythology in Number 3. One of Tarantino’s gifts is in creating very lived-in minor characters that look like they were breathing and eating long before being summoned for their short appearance. Take Esteban, for example, the Mexican pimp and father figure to Bill. There’s a whole history to this guy and and how he raised Bill, but he’s gone after all of five minutes of screen time.
And let’s not forget Buck. Who’s here to do what? Fuck. A rather simplistic and base behavioral drive. But an unforgettable one, for sure.
10. The Five Point Palm Exploding Heart Technique
It’s fucking awesome. ‘Nuff said.
Chapter Five: The Blood-Splattered Sequel Rumors And Conclusion
Credit: Miramax
This past October 10th, 2004, it’ll have been 21 years since the premier of Kill Bill Vol. I. It’s hard to believe that much time has passed. For me it’s a literal whole other lifetime ago.
Not long after the conclusion of Vol. II, rumors began to swirl about a possible third installment. All kinds of theories abounded regarding possible plots. The most popular being a grown-up Nikki Green seeking out Beatrix to get revenge for killing her mother, with an assassin-trained adult B.B. being in the mix.
As much as the fan in me would love to see a third Kill Bill, I’m not sure it should happen. I’m very much a “completionist.” When a story is done, let it be done. I feel that way, as do many others, about the first two Alien and Terminator films. I feel that way toward Kill Bill. It ends as perfectly as it could. Why ruin that with a sequel? The whole point of the two-part film is The Bride rescuing her daugher from her savage life for a peaceful one. Which she does. But perhaps Bill is right in his “Superman talk.” Maybe Beatrix Kiddo is a killer at heart. Maybe it’s just a matter of time before that deadly assassin life will pull her back in. We’ll just have to wait and see. But I’d much rather think of Beatrix and B.B. living happily ever after.
I’ve been on a horror kick lately. I finally watched Barbarian. A film I wanted to see two years when it premiered, only to completely forget about until it resurfaced on Prime recently.
Barbarian is the latest in the “socially conscious” horror trend, which started with Get Out in 2018. Even our horror film franchises have to be woke nowadays. I recall a much simpler time. A time when all you needed was a mask, preferably a white one, and some maniac with a knife. A little cat and mouse. Some butchered coeds. And there you go, you had your movie.
Of course, the slasher tropes started by Halloween and Friday the 13th were tired and formularic even by the late 1980s. This is why Scream was such a refreshing hit back in 1996. It playfully toyed with the genre conventions in a fun, meta way, with characters using them as a “rulebook” to help ensure their own survival.
Don’t go off alone.
Never say you’ll be “right back.”
Never, ever have sex.
Scream was the shit back in the day. It not only kickstarted the teen slasher craze all over again, it helped director Wes Craven get back in the game. It was a mega jackpot win for screenwriter Kevin Williamson, who wrote the script on spec. It’s unlikely his record for most commercially successful spec script not written by a writer/director will ever be broken. The Scream franchise has scored nearly $1 billion at the box office alone. Imagine that. Being some rank nobody 31-year-old screenwriter and you have a pdf file on your rickety old PC computer that’s worth billions. It’s the stuff dreams are made of. And he wrote it in a weekend.
Two sequels quickly followed the original hit. Then the franchise went dormant for awhile. This is back before reboots and requels and prequels became a big thing in horror. In 2011 Wes Craven directed Scream 4. That was followed by another movie lull, though the TV series Scream ran from 2015–2019. Until finally Scream (the fifth film) and ScreamVI came out back to back in 2022 and ’23, with plans for a seventh on the way.
It isn’t just Scream’s almost 30-year longevity that’s amazing, but the relative high quality the franchise has maintained. Most horror series fall apart after the original. Some keep chugging along despite being objectively goddawful, i.e. Halloween, Saw, Hellraiser, etc. With the exception of Scream 3, every installment in the franchise is fresh on Rotten Tomatoes. Even Final Destination, with its clever teen-killing conceit, sits mainly in the sub-50s on RT.
So, what’s Scream’s secret? Why has it qualitatively lasted for so long while so many others have pathetically limped from one refresh to another?
Scream has some built-in requisite elements that act as quality control. Every Scream film has its gimmicks — mainly a twisty whodunnit plot with multiple meta references. A balanced measure of comedy, thrills, and melodrama. A tone that strays just outside the lines of realism into cartoonism. This precarious tight rope act isn’t easy. The latest two films are meta inside of meta; referencing the in-movie Stab series, which itself is a self-aware horror film that replicates scenes from the first Scream. The whole self-referential effect becomes like an MC Escher staircase, but with blood and knives.
‘Scream’ (1996): Dimension films.
Scream has also served as a recurring mirror of the current state of horror, if not the cultural subtext influencing the genre. In 1996, it was quite innovative to introduce a beloved B-list sweetheart like Drew Barrymore, only to brutally kill her off in the opening. By 2011, the franchise had to adjust that formula with multiple twists, with mixed results. The latest two films have followed Hollywood’s latest diversity push, replacing the mainly White teen cast in the previous four with two leads of Hispanic origin — Jenny Ortega and Melissa Barrera — and assorted minority back-ups, with hardly a White male in sight (save for villainous roles, of course). All while letting OG Scream-ers like Neve Campbell, David Arquette, and Courtney Cox reenter on occasion.
It all makes for a nice adaptive organism of a franchise that can constantly reinvent itself to fit the times. I wonder what sort of State of the Horror Union address a Scream re-re-re-boot might make come the 2030s or even 2040s. The latest sequel already transplanted us to the Big Apple, à la Jason Takes Manhattan. Ghostface in Space is just a matter of time.
These days, it’s not enough to just throw another set of endangered teens out there and watch them get butchered in obscene ways. Scream films are a thinking man’s slasher flicks, dare I say. At the least they offer something a cut above your typical violent bloodletting. I find myself strangely looking forward to the next one.
Last night I finally had the chance to catch Barbarian, the 2022 horror film written and directed by Zach Cregger. Like most films with memorable twists that I’m not able to see the very second it premiers, I had this one spoiled massively for me due to rampant YouTube reviews with certain images in the thumbnails.
Can we talk for a second about the humanitarian crisis this clickbait spoiler-craze really is? Barbarian is the just the latest in a string of highly anticipated films and shows that had plot reveals ruined for me. Don’t Look Now was, too. I’ve also had every major plot twist of Invincible (my new favorite show) shoved in my face thanks to YouTube shorts and “critical analysis” vids. It’s frustrating, but I suppose that’s the way things are now.
That said, SPOILERS incoming.
Barbarian starts off appearing to be your standard Hitchcock-style roommate stalker thriller, like The Resident or Single White Female. A young woman named Tess (Georgina Campbell) shows up late at night during a thunderstorm to her AirBnB in a decrepit part of Detroit, only to find someone else staying there. A young man named Keith, who looks nice enough. But can she really trust this guy? Somehow their reservations were booked simultaneously, leading to the awkward situation of two strangers having to share a house for the evening.
After Tess is unable to find a hotel due to a medical conference, she’s forced to spend the night. But soon she discovers this AirBnB has dark, macabre secrets, including a creepy basement room with a dirty mattress and a subterranean labyrinthine that seems straight out of a Kane Pixels “backrooms” video. But that’s only the beginning of the terror. A hideous humanoid monster also lives down there, too. And she feels the need, the need to feed.
Then suddenly we cut to Southern California, where working actor AJ (Justin Long) is cruising along in his convertible when he receives word from his agent/producer that he’s been accused of rape by a former co-star. With his life in shambles, he’s forced to liquidate some assets to pay for legal defense. So he flies off to Michigan to visit his, you guessed it, AirBnB rental property, where Tess and Keith just disappeared. It isn’t long before he too is captured by the monster, who has a bizarre need to “mother” her captives by forcibly breastfeeding them.
Suddenly, we’re launched into a flashback to the early 1980s, when the neighborhood was in good shape. We’re introduced to Frank, a middle-aged single man who kidnaps young women and holds them prisoner in his house of horrors. The “mother” creature there now is the hideous offspring of numerous inbreeding generations over four decades. Essentially, the ultimate thematic representation of male sexual assault coming home to roost.
—
Barbarian is mostly a smartly-written B-movie flick with a tight opening act. But I’m not sure the transition from its tense-filled beginning into a sequence straight out of The Hills Have Eyes, entirely works. It feels like two seperate stories were mashed together in the service of creating a Get Out-style socially conscious horror film. It’s tonal shift and plot twist is basically Psycho. Even Keith, played by Bill Skarsgård, reminded me of Norman Bates. The underlying theme regarding male violence, sexual harassment, and rape, is a relevant and timely one.
The movie is a cut-above the “hilbilly horror” schlock of the early 2000s, such as Wrong Turn or Jeepers Creepers. I enjoyed it, overall. But the film was far more engaging during its subtext-soaked first act, when even something like a simple bottle of wine appears menacing. When it becomes a freaky monster mash, it loses its thematic impact. Sexual predators rarely appear like the monsters they are. They’re often smooth talkers, manipulating their victims emotionally, only implying the threat of violence, until finally trapping them. Sexual assault is a grotesque physical crime, but much of it is psychological, too. Such ghastly human behavior is better explored realistically to relay its horror. AJ has a conversation with his best friend at a club, where he confesses how he had to “convince” the young actress to have sex with him, which is far creepier and more true to life. As is his later drunken phone call to his victim. AJ is a classic “mild-mannered” wolf in sheep’s clothing abuser. Clark Kent, except he rapes instead of changes into a hero in a phone booth. That sort of everyday psychopath is far more intriguing to observe than just another mutated creature.
There are many illogical plot turns and character choices that no sane person would ever make. While it’s believable that a single woman might stay at an AirBnB with a strange man by herself due to a reservation mix-up, you’re telling me she never even checked out the surrounding neighborhood? Google Maps is your friend. I also highly doubt anyone, male or female, would keep heading down into a creepy labyrinthe, even if their new guy friend was supposedly in trouble. The irritated police showing up, only to dismiss Tess as just another slumming crackhead, was far too convenient. Most police have very good sixth senses. Tess comes across as clearly educated and articulate, i.e. someone you take seriously. And wouldn’t there have been a history of young women disappearing in the general neighborhood that would trigger some suspicion from the cops? Frank’s abductions numbered in the dozens. There was no logical need for AJ to even visit his rental property, as liquidating it could all be done via email and pdf file signatures. He only went there because the plot needed him to. And how did a malnourished inbred freak develop super strength and become a giant? Most victims held prisoner in similar cases have usually turned up bony and uncoordinated due to isolation and vitamin deficiencies.
Then there’s that ending, which was almost laughable.
These questionable elements aside, and its jarring narative shifts, Barbarian is a decent film worth checking out.
There will never be a part-Hispanic/part-White, devastatingly handsome, six foot tall, thin, modestly fit, straight, quite masculine, Colorado-born, PA to ND transplant, very late Gen-Xer like myself properly portrayed in film. Should I despair?
“Private Vasquez.” Source: 20th Century Fox
One of my favorite films as a kid, which still is to this day, is Aliens. James Cameron’s brilliant high-octane 1986 sequel to Ridley Scott’s 1979 classic horror Alien.
Set 57 years after the events of the first film, Aliens sees heroine Ellen Ripley return to face the terror that destroyed her crew and ship. This time with a platoon of badass Colonial Marines packed to the gills with awesome firepower, sent to rescue a remote colony that has been infiltrated by the monsters with acid for blood. “This time it’s war.”
This movie blew my six-year old mind when I first saw it. I loved everything about it. The sets and visuals. The story, which starts meaningfully slow, and builds up to become a runaway freight train. The mother-daughter relationship between Ripley and the only colony survivor, the 8-year old girl Newt. The unique and awesome firepower, including the pulse rifle, and the “steadicam that kills,” as Cameron describes in the script of the massive Smartgun. And of course, the flamethrowers. The memorable and very quotable lines of dialogue. “Game over, man! Game over!” “Nuke the entire site from orbit. It’s the only way to be sure.” The giant APC. The pulse-pounding score. The climactic battle between Ripley in the powerloader and the Queen Alien. The strongly written characters. Hicks, the mature corporal leader. Hudson, the smartass. Bishop, the stoic and self-sacrificial android. And especially Vasquez, the street tough Latina.
As I got older, and became more ethnically self-aware, I found myself particularly drawn to the Vasquez character. Though I was not exactly conscious of it, I was appreciative of the fact that one of my favorite movies prominantly featured someone who kind of looked like me. And, in fact, might even share some of my ethnicity. Vasquez’s precise ethnic background is never mentioned in the movie. In the screenplay, Cameron only mentions her as being from South Central Los Angeles. She could be Mexican, Colombian, Nicaraguan, etc. I didn’t really care. She was darker-skinned. That was good enough. I thought that was pretty cool, in a novel albeit trivial sort of way. Like when you meet someone who happens to have the same birthday as yourself.
Nonetheless, Vasquez was my cinema avatar. My Brown Sorta Sister. As I mentioned in another article, I’m part Mexican, Italian, English, Irish, and a host of other things. It doesn’t really matter. Point is, growing up, I was dark enough to clearly indicate that I was Not White for the most part. When you are Not White, you get Teasing Questions from other kids. To be fair, you get Teasing Questions if you look different in any way as a kid— ask most redheads or people who were “big-boned,” about their childhoods, and they’ll often get Vietnam-style PTSD flashbacks. But as a Not White, Teasing Questions take on a distinct Grand Inquisition style, with such probes as, “What are you?” and “Where are you from?” and others often hurled your way. Usually from peers, but sometimes even from random adults.
I moved around a lot, too. I averaged a new neighborhood about every 18 months. So I was always the new kid. This made it hard to become one of the Cool Not Whites. Instead, I was perpetually a Mystery Not White. This wasn’t really a big deal in grade school, where peers tended to be more concerned with your cartoon loyalties than your race. Once I got to high school, it became more pronounced, especially since one of the government daycare camps I went to was a Diversity High School. And generally speaking, most of the Not Whites didn’t exactly fit into the structure of the school. We had metal detectors. Gang fights. Rampant drug dealing and drug doing. Racial and ethnic divisions. And in the case of my school, a vocal, pronounced, and very proud Puerto Rican and Dominican presence.
An example of the racial tensions simmering under the surface of my Diversity High School: I once made the catastrophic mistake of categorizing Hispanics as White in a biology class, only for some Brooklyn-hailing Puerto Rican princess in hoop earrings and pink yoga sweats to start yelling at me about how “dat ain’t true,” in an obscenity-laced tirade. All while the biology teacher — some pudgy White beta male with an earring, wearing creased New Balance sneakers and dress shorts — did fuck all to keep order. It’s no fun being mixed in a Diversity High School. Or in life in general, for that matter.
My mother is White, and my father is Mexican. They split when I was an infant, as such inter-ethnic/racial pairings often go. She later married a White guy, and had three kids. This didn’t help me any, as now I stood out even more. Not just due to my Not Whiteness, but also because I was the oldest offspring by a good margin, and the only one from a different father.
Naturally, our family lived in White neighborhoods. I attended mainly White public schools (except for DHS). Went to all-White churches. Basically all of my friends were White. I often placed in those very special Advanced Placement classes due to my above average “smartness.” The ones with the kids who are all going to College. Maybe even (awed hush) Ivy League Universities. Those classes were always 99% White.
The notion of my “differentness” didn’t start to manifest until I was an adolescent/pre-teen. It wasn’t a big deal or anything. I was always treated nicely. I was a well-behaved lower middle class kid, and consequently well-liked. But still, I clung to my Brown Sorta Sister, Private Vasquez. And I couldn’t help but start to notice in my voracious media consumption, that there were hardly, if any, people my shade. Even though I admired many actors of all backgrounds, suddenly, inexplicably, I felt the uncanny need for a Representation Fix.
It was the late ‘80s/’90s, so the only “color TV” were shows like Family Matters, The Cosby Show, Hangin’ With Mr. Cooper, Kenan and Kel, and the ahead-of-its-time diversely cast Nickelodeon show All That. Television was still largely segregated back then, divided between White shows and Black shows, with little mixing outside of token characters or cameos. While I enjoyed some Black shows, I wasn’t Black myself, so there was no hope of getting my Representation Fix from them. There was little if any programming with Hispanic characters. Oddly enough, I had to watch I Love Lucy — a show made in the freaking ‘50s, starring Cuban-born Desi Arnaz —just to get a taste of Latin flavoring.
As for movies, they were mainly White affairs. Aryan Arnold, who was every ’80’s/’90’s kid’s idol at one point, and the Italian Stallion Stallone ruled the macho Alpha Male hero market, with Scotch/Irish-y Bruce Willis in tow. Pre-slap Will Smith was your go-to Black Guy. Keanu Reeves was your Half-White Half-Asian but White Enough to not be Not White and so therefore Basically White Guy action hero. If there were any leading Hispanic actors back then, I never saw them, or don’t recall any. Usually anyone who looked like they hailed south of the border was relegated to the sidelines, or just a random extra in the background. Gang Leader #4. Prison Cellmate #2. The darker the character, often the dirtier the character. Or if a character were actually Latin, they were whitewashed by someone with a milkier dermal disposition, or a different nationality altogether. Al Pacino as Scarface, for instance. That sort of deal. Even as recently as 2012, Christopher Nolan swapped Bane’s Latino identity for an Eastern European-hailing thug in The Dark Knight Rises. A disappointment to me not so much because of the whitewashing, but because I wanted a Bane more authentic to what I’d seen in Batman: The Animated Series.
Hey, that was alright, I thought back then. I had my Brown Sorta Sister Vasquez. She was all I needed to satisfy my Representation Fix.
And then one day I discovered that the actress who played Private Vasquez, far from being a Latina of any type, was actually a Jewish woman. And not just a Jewish woman, but a fair-skinned one at that, who essentially played Vasquez in brown face, darkened up with make-up to match the tone of the character’s possibly Mexican melanin-tinted heritage.
The actress’s name is Jenette Goldstein, a Cameron standby, playing roles in Titanic and Terminator 2: Judgment Day, amongst many others in a long and varied, on again off again TV/movie career.
This revelation wasn’t exactly earth-shattering. I was old enough to realize actors often played characters with ethnic backgrounds different from their real-life own. It was a somewhat numbing experience, however. Certainly, it was a teachable moment. It had all been a lie. My Brown Sorta Sister, like some imaginary childhood friend, never really existed. Even though it was the character that I had bonded with — which was and still is of a similar matching ethnicity — and not so much the actress herself, the fact that the actress’s ethnic background was distinctly not Not White like mine, and clearly White, nonetheless kind of ruined the suspension of disbelief. I had to make peace with the fact that this character that I had always loved was like something out of a minstrel show.
It’s bizarre to think about now, but there was a time when Hollywood had no idea what to do when it came to “ethnic” casting. There were no rules. At the least, it was much more (literally) Black and White. You had White characters and occasionally Black ones for a little spice. Rarely did they mix if it wasn’t for comedic or token effect. Or if the show or movie was racially themed, like set during the Civil War or the Civil Rights movement, or something. That was about it.
James Cameron cast and shot Aliens in England in 1985, right next door to the same lot Stanley Kubrick was filming Full Metal Jacket, in fact. The mid-’80s England theater/acting scene wasn’t exactly a huge melting pot. Goldstein came to audition for Vasquez dressed in a fancy gown she was wearing for a Victorian Age play she was in at the time. It’s not exactly surprising that Cameron was unable to find a legit Latina in merry old England in order to properly portray the tough and streety South Central L.A. character he had written for the Alien sequel. Michelle Rodriguez would have only been 7 years old at the time. Far too young to convincingly play a badass machine-gun wielding chica dura.
Now, if one were a racial grievance monger, or simply of a lesser mind (i.e. woke), they might be outraged and excessively butthurt at the fact that a movie character was portrayed in brown face as late as the late 1980s. But I am neither a monger nor of a lesser mind. (Remember, I was in all those Advanced Placement classes.) Even though “losing” Vasquez, my Brown Sorta Sister, was like losing a good friend, the conclusion that I eventually came to was not some self-righteous moral condemnation of Hollywood’s well-known history of White preferential casting. It was to realize that it had been foolish and immature of me to ever think I needed some kind of Representation Fix in the first place.
It was to realize that representation is bullshit.
Of course, nowadays, racial and ethnic representation is all the rage in Hollywood. The Big Thing to do now is swap popular, originally White lead characters, and replace them with Black actors. The Little Mermaid is the most recent example. A trend that’s been met with controversy on all sides of the debate. White nerds on YouTube decry it as “woke” and “White erasure,” or something. Proud wokesters declare it a form of “equity,” a reflection of the sensibilities of “modern audiences,” or something. And still some still call it “tokenism.” Or corporate virtue signaling to appeal to a broader market. Or something.
It’s all very silly and stupid to me. Though it does strike me as a cringy overcorrection. As if Hollywood were trying to make up for its past exclusionary casting sins by throwing in as many non-Whites as it can into lead roles. There are apparently diversity laws now that govern Hollywood, which necessitate that particular identity boxes be checked during casting before a movie can be greenlit. All in the effort to reflect the modern, diverse world in which we live in. Though it’s not as if astute observers like myself don’t see the subtext underlying the sudden good-hearted racially-minded castings— the violence wreaked in the summer of 2020 during the Black Lives Matter riots over the death of George Floyd. Amongst other supposed racially-motivated killings of Black Americans over the last decade and a half or so. And lest we forget #OscarsSoWhite, the viral hashtag denouncing the injustice of the 2015 Academy Awards nominating 20 all-White actors. The Blackening of Hollywood had been a long time coming. Whether adding more Blacks constitutes actual “diversity” or simply more tokenism to appease an activist mob is a subject for another article. For now, we’ll go along with it.
Personally, I often feel a quiet civil war within my mind over whether this latest diversifying trend is genuine or not, and by extension, good or bad. I’d like to think it’s my reasoning faculties weighing the trend impartially. But perhaps it’s just my middle-aged cynical side thinking it’s merely the actions of a few conglomerate entertainment companies attempting to hook a wider audience, while keeping themselves out of the crosshairs of the trigger-happy Twitter hashtag mafia.
There are two camps of thought on this, I’ve found. The Doomer “Who Cares It’s Just Entertainment” Camp, and the Crying Zoomer “No, What About Authenticity and the Author’s Intent!” Camp.
In the Who Cares It’s Just entertainment Camp, I ask myself why the hell do grown ass men care what color the little mermaid is? Or that Anne Boleyn is being portrayed by a dark-skinned Black actress? The former is fictional. The latter we all know was in reality a very White British lady. It’s not like seeing Boleyn portrayed by a Black actress is going to brainwash people into thinking the British monarchy was Black during the 1800s.
But then the Crying Zoomer wails that certain stories and characters are representations of ethnic history and culture. For instance, Lord of the Rings is Tolkien’s fantasy version of Middle Ages England, which is why all the characters are White. Or at least they were. Did Tolkien mean for his work to represent “modern audiences?” Or, was he making a contemplative statement on humanity’s temptation to abuse power, with a sort of Christian allegory, based off of a region that was 99.9% White up until about fifty years ago? As for The Little Mermaid, it’s a Danish fairy tale. Shouldn’t that mean it’s only meant for White characters?
There’s certainly a place for factoring in the ethnicity of characters, especially when historical accuracy is required. I’d be taken aback to see Abraham Lincoln being portrayed by Denzel Washington in an Oscar-level biopic. But if such a thing were to happen, so what? Hollywood can’t change history. Even if Denzel Washington played Lincoln, that wouldn’t suddenly change reality. He did just fine portraying Macbeth, afterall, and no harm subsequently befell the former King of Scots’ caucasian integrity. Lincoln would still be a White dude. Lincoln’s race is besides the point anyway. We discuss him to this day, and will continue to do so into the far future, because of his tremendous accomplishments, and his values as a man and as a president. That he was White is incidental in the grand scheme of things.
It’s taken me a lifetime to achieve what I believe is the highest and most enlightened mindset when it comes to this issue of representation. I speak as someone who overcame the false belief that it is in some way essential. Here’s the deal: If you are outsourcing your sense of self-worth and validation to casting agents in Hollywood, if you only feel “seen,” when people who happen to kind of match your ethnic background are on TV or in the movies playing pretend characters, then you are foolishly delusional and chasing a phantom.
What exactly is the concept of “you?” I think if you’re looking at yourself primarily, or in large part, in terms of race or ethnicity, you’re shortchanging yourself a great deal. You’re ignoring qualities or abilities that actually matter. But let’s say you can’t help but see yourself through the lens of race. And let’s say that seeing others that share your race/ethnicity on screen is of the utmost priority to your emotional well-being, or sense of “belonging,” or “being seen” within a culture or community. Ok, then, does that still apply if the person who shares your racial/ethnic identity on screen has a different nationality? Or comes from a different sub-culture or tribe within an ethnicity or race? Or has a different political persuasion? Or different religion? Why should things like race, sexuality, and gender get all the attention? Why not height, political affiliation, weight, or socio-economic class?
Besides, society likes to lump the races into big catch-all pots. But Russians are very different to the English, even if they share a similar skin tone. Just as South Africans or Nigerians are different from Haitians. Then you have very pale-skinned Whites, olive-skinned Whites, light and dark-skinned Blacks. You have white-skinned blue-eyed blonde Hispanics, and darker-skinned Hispanics. My Hispanic roots trace mostly to the Nuevo Léon territory of northeastern Mexico. I have no clue what side of the island my Irish and English roots are mostly from, or what side of the boot my Italian heritage hails. But I suppose if we’re going to take all this identity politics stuff seriously, it would make it impossible for me to feel “seen” if anyone outside of my territories of origin were to be on screen playing a character. Supposing Goldstein was actually Mexican, but hailed from Baja California. I guess that would rule her out for me.
When you start down the path of “validation by racial/gender/sexuality representation,” you begin to realize that it’s an unobtainable goal, especially taken to its granular extreme. All it does is set you up to fail, chasing some phantom snake oil elixir meant to supposedly cure your racial identity crisis and need for acceptance.
Representation, as far as what Hollywood produces, is no better than one of those useless scam products on late night TV. It’s the Shake Weight of racial reconciliation.
There are a million better ways to work your forearm muscles than one that makes it look like you’re jacking off Andre the Android. There are a million better ways to “fix” racial imbalances than sticking race-swapped characters on the boob tube and calling it good.
Supposed “identity validators” can be fluid and fall from grace anyway. Take J.K. Rowling, for instance. Once a shining feminist icon through which many young women ported their sense of value and pride. A single mom who rose up from poverty to become a billionaire author on her own power and create a mega franchise single-handedly. An inspiring story of grit and determination. During introductions at a literary analysis class in college, nearly half the room (all women) credited the Harry Potter books as their inspiration to study English and become writers. Nowadays, Ms. Rowling has fallen sharply out of favor, impaled on the social sword of “intolerance” and “bigotry” for her unacceptance of the trans community’s/activist’s interpretations of gender and sex. Former fans burn her books. Her Twitter is no longer a place of magic, but a bloody sparring ground of ideological clashes.
Perhaps I’m being a bit obtuse and simplistic here. But I’m trying to illustrate an argument by absurdity. My point is, the destination that you will ultimately arrive at in this long introspective quest for the validation of “you” is obviously yourself — you, the individual, which, as Snoop says, cannot be replicated by someone else, or duplicated.
And that’s just considering the racial/gender/sexuality angle. As implied at the very top with my laundry list of very accurate personal attributes, it would be impossible to find your exact equal anywhere on earth, much less on the screen. So why care so much? Who could be you but you?
For the record, I fall more into the Doomer camp from the aforementioned debate over diversifying casting changes. But with a twist. I don’t really care much about supposed casting diversity. If the actor is good and the story is written well, I’ll likely enjoy it no matter who’s playing what roles. I recently watched Sean Baker’s 2015 film Tangerine, about two transgender Black prostitutes living on the streets of Los Angeles. Even though I’m pretty far from the race and sexuality identities of the main characters, I still enjoyed the film, which was mainly about jealousy, jilted love, betrayal, forgiveness, repressed and closeted sexual desires, and friendship. Even if you can’t relate necessarily to the characters, or to every thread or idea in a film, a good story provides universal themes that anyone can relate to in some way. At the least, it was a fascinating look at an unusual subculture.
However, don’t sit there and expect me to believe we’re making social “progress” just because the little mermaid is Black. GTFO of here with that. And further, it’s okay to prefer actors of particular races to play certain characters, especially in stories or series you love. That doesn’t make you racist. It makes you a loyal fan. It’s okay to want to see people who look like you. But so do others who may not share your racial background. So it’s best not to get your ego and sense of identity too tied up with how fictional characters are portrayed on screen.
At the end of the day, I’m a representative of one. Myself. That’s it. I still love Vasquez. I hold nothing against the talented actress who played her. In fact, I think it’s incredible she was able to transform so effectively that she had me fooled for years. I still revere James Cameron. He’s still one of my favorite writer/directors. He’s part of the reason I’m a writer today. And, of course, I still love Aliens.